Sunday, 5 July 2015

Gnostics are world haters

People have forgotten that Jehovah once flooded the whole earth and killed everyone except Noah because he hated his own creation.

"Do not love the world nor the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. " (1 John 2:15)

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the boastful pride of life, is not from the Father, but is from the world. " (1 John 2:16)

"The world is passing away, and also its lusts; but the one who does the will of God lives forever. " (1 John 2:17)
What most people don't know is that earth is ruled by evil Archons whose leader is the devil who is one of the sons of Jehovah which can be revealed from Jesus's own statement in John 8:44, "You are from the father of the devil". This implies that the Devil is one of the sons of Jehovah (the God of the Jews | the Demiurge).

Its literally impossible to rid this world from all evil by any other means except through the gnosis of the Father because this world or earth is ruled by evil Archons who will always make men weak and vulnerable to sin and it is one of the reasons why the Gnostics never set up any moral rules for themselves or never tried to proselytize someone or never ever expected that the earth will somehow turn into a new heaven if everyone adopted their ideology or blindly believed in the saviour.

The Gnostics were clever and they understood the cosmic hierarchy in which they were living in. They knew that the Platonic world of King Helios-Mithras was something extraordinary compared to its model created by Jehovah, the Demiurge who was secretly moved by Sophia and the foolish Demiurge just like human beings thought that he was acting alone and declared himself that "I am God and none beside me." and immediately came a reply from the higher heavens, "You are wrong Samael (Oh god of the blind)!, there is an Immortal Perfect One above you".

"It was quite amazing that the Aeons were emanating from the Father in as much as they were not able to perceive and recognize the one in whom they were." (Gospel of Truth)

Once a man has seen such an amazing view in the Platonic realm how can he love this world which is just a mere shadow copy of the real things that exists in the Pleroma. I almost feel like spitting on this world because this place is such a gutter and no wonder why some Gnostics had an attitude of escaping from this world as soon as possible which evoked the Neo-platonic Philosopher Plotinus to say, "If they hate this world so much why don't they commit suicide and escape from this world."

But what Plotinus don't know is that if you commit suicide you don't leave this world but instead you start a new life all over again from the beginning. You know, that sucks!. Gnostics have the guts to let a secret out which Plato and others found that this secret if it gets out would destroy the very fabric of this world. The secret is simply this, the world is evil and it is ruled by evil Archons whose leader is the Devil. Christ came from above to give us gnosis by delivering us from our sins and let loose us from being a prisoner in a cave and gave us what no eye has seen and what no Archon ear has heard.

Yes, Gnostics are world haters and we have a very good reason to hate it. Sometimes it is better to say the truth and be a jerk rather than be nice and give people false hopes that things are going to turn bright when it never will.

Wednesday, 24 June 2015

I am an Hard Polytheist

They’re not all the same: Meet some other hard polytheists


To be precise I am an Modalistic Emanationist.

On Modalistic Emanationism

"Modalistic emanationism does not maintain that all of the Gods are names of one God, nor that “all gods are one God, all goddesses one Goddess.” Instead, that all of the Gods are distinct and unique personalities, all descended from one Divine Unity, which exists, collectively, in all of Them together. The Gods are sacred wine, poured out from a single krater, though each is an individual kylix, and thus removing any of these kylices takes away a portion of the wine, leaving the fullness incomplete."

I couldn't have put more beautifully than the way the above author of the blog has put it. 

 

Sunday, 21 June 2015

The Occult Science of Indian Astrology

       Ancient Persians (Magi) and Indians were masters of magic, astrology and the occult, while the Persian nation entirely got converted into Islam, Indians have preserved the occult science of astrology and magic which is still in vogue on every nook and corner of the nation.

It was the Sun God who revealed the occult science of astrology to the demon Mara and this science is preserved in an ancient text called Surya Siddhanta. Astrology shows that all the events in our lives are predetermined according to the position of the planets. Even the psychological behaviour and the physique of a person is predetermined according to the date and place of birth of a person.


There are many online sites where you can enter the date, time and place of your birth and obtain your future and current predictions. For example the below details of mine was taken from www.astrologyandme.com website. Anyone who has seen me from close would know that my characteristics and nature are exactly identical to the one predicted by the science of astrology.

General Characteristics

  • You might be a  restless worker. You are optimistic in approaching things. You are always cheerful and never sit idle. You are not only cheerful, but also cheer up others and inspire others to work.
  • You  are  intelligent and want to know more and more.  You  study well.  You  come up in life because of your  studies.  You  love outdoors  and nature. You like to visit lonely places and  places where one can see nature in her beauties. You love active sports especially  in  your young age. You are aware of your own  work, studies and responsibilities. When you are engaged in your work, you  do  not interfere in others matters. This way  of  approach towards others may be understood as narrow mindedness.
  • You  are  sympathetic and have a kind heart towards  people.  You help people a lot and bring them up in life. You may be described as bringers of sunshine into gloomy situations.
  • You will be engaged in a respectable profession. You are hard working, don't like to sit idle, will be trusted by everybody and will be a responsible person. However, people around you who are jealous of you, will try hinder your progress.
  • Your hard work and devotion to work will fetch you suddenly quite a good amount of property and wealth. However, as stated earlier, jealous people around may try to destroy this.
  • You will be known for your diplomatic dealings and the efficient way of persuading people. You will go abroad on account of diplomatic missions. You will be loved and respected by everybody. You will be very much successful in your mission and win the hearts of both the sending as well as the receiving parties.
  • Success in business indicated.
  • You are not sociable and will have few friends. You will be reserved and introvert in nature.
  • You are a person having great power both with respect to your speech as well as your physique. People without too much guts will not try to go against you. However some people will try to come in your way. You will not keep quiet but give them back in the right way. Once they come to know about your powerful nature they will dare to do anything against you in future.  

Nature and Behaviour

  • You tend to be friendly, communicative, indecisive, unsure, liking to do two or more things at once, active mentally, temperamental, nervous or anxious, superficial, and always ready for something different. Natives like you are often quite witty and clever, but present themselves in a less cheerful and changeable way. Your observation are sharp but the overall manner is sometimes a bit rude. You have a strong need to communicate what you already know and to learn more. You enjoy reading and travelling as they both give plenty of scope for picking up new knowledge. 
  • You need variety and can be the jack of all trades and the master of none.You are quick witted, sometimes shy or retiring humane, good disposition but nervous and restless. You will be polite, amicable, skilled and a good orator.You may be disciplined & despite of having good qualities you may lack patience. You may have ever-changing views and shifting objectives.You love to talk, both with your mouth as well as your hands.You may lack in concentration and quick decision. 
  • You might be a bit reserved and introvert in nature.
  • You do not believe in having resolutions which are meant only to show and not to implement. You feel that having such principles is the most of foolish thing. So you feel that it is better not to have such showy principles. In fact, you do not have any such principles, because you are a practical person.
  • You will have interest in poetry, literature. Jupiter in the second house increases the chances of your success. You will get a good looking life partner, fortune, family and surroundings. Yours would be an easy going personality.
  • You acquire wealth by various means. Your children will be intelligent, respect elders and educated. They might be little reserve.
  • People take you as Stingy when you are unwilling to give or spend much, but that's your own way of avoiding over expenditure.
  • Laziness and idleness might be one of your attributes.

Family

  • You will have a very good relationship with your mother.

Education

  • You might take up science as your subject and may get involved in deep researches.

Sunday, 24 May 2015

Sir Roger Penrose is arguably the next Einstein

          Sir Roger Penrose, a Knight on Tiles, an Emperor of the mind and the only person on earth after Albert Einstein who has the ability to visualize the 4 dimensional space-time and make necessary modifications to General Relativity at the planck scale. The only scientist who firmly believes that Quantum mechanics is both incomplete and as well as inconsistent defending Albert Einstein's famous quote, "God does not play dice". He was the only mathematician who understood the implications of Godel's undecidable theorems to physics and to consciousness very early in his career. The only cosmologist who went beyond the Big Bang and answered the question what happened before it.



Penrose is currently working on his Twistor theory completely alienated from the scientific community who are all working on an alternative theory called as the string theory. However Penrose is mostly known for his series of attacks against the proponents of Strong AI starting from Emperor's New Mind which won the New York Times best seller and one of the most important discovery of the 20th century and continued his attacks in Shadows of the mind which firmly established the conclusion that,
     "The inescapable conclusion seems to be: Mathematicians are not using a knowably sound calculation procedure in order to ascertain mathematical truth. We deduce that mathematical understanding – the means whereby mathematicians arrive at their conclusions with respect to mathematical truth – cannot be reduced to blind calculation!"
          —Sir Roger Penrose

What this implies is that a machine can never ever surpass human intelligence for all cases. Of course there can be complex machine learning algorithms which will give machines enough ability to beat humans while playing chess or driving a car or recognizing patterns but the inevitable conclusion seems to be a robot can never ever surpass the intelligence of human mathematicians.

The center piece of the argument comes from the Godel-Turing theorem derived by Roger Penrose in his book Shadows of the Mind. The argument goes like there are perfect mathematical statements where a machine will never halt or will run forever.

For example: 

1. Find a natural number which is not a sum of powers of 2.
2. Find an even number greater than 2 which is not the sum of two primes. (Goldbach's conjecture) .
For the first case the machine will never halt and for the second since we do not yet have a proof for the Goldbach's conjecture we do not know whether the machine will halt or not. Now based on such computations where a machine will never halt Penrose speculates if there is an underlying algorithm or a procedure that we humans are using to deduce whether a given computation performed on a natural number halts or not.
Let us assume A be the set of all computations known to human beings to deduce whether a given computation on a natural number halts or not. Or in other words if a computation C does not halt then A halts giving us the output that C does not infact halt.
Penrose takes us through a series of arguments using Cantor's diagonal argument  where he proves that such an sound algorithmic procedure A encompassing all known computations known to human beings if it exists will fail to stop for one given computation where we actually know that the computation C in fact does not stop. Or in other words A will run forever without halting when in fact C does not halt.  This is a contradiction the algorithmic procedure A encompassing all known computations was assumed to be the underlying procedure used by human beings to ascertain whether a computation will halt or not but as we have just now proved there will always exist a computation C where we know that the computation C will not halt but the procedure A fails to halt and there by fails to know whether C halts or not and therefore A cannot be the underlying procedure used by human beings as it leads to a contradiction which is quite obvious for anyone to see. Human beings are not Turing machines or a human mind is not a Turing machine.
“Either mathematics is too big for the human mind or the human mind is more than a machine.”
– Kurt Gödel
“Gödel’s Theorem shows that human thought is more complex and less mechanical than anyone had ever believed”
- Rudy Rucker
The above proof is known as the Penrose's version of the Godel-Turing theorem.  Since I am a programmer and not a mathematician I completely understand this Turing's version of Penrose's argument against Strong AI compared to the pure Godel's version of it which was summarized by David Chalmers below.

"(1) suppose that “my reasoning powers are captured by some formal system F,” and, given this assumption, “consider the class of statements I can know to be true.”  (2) Since I know that I am sound, F is sound, and so is F’, which is simply F plus the assumption (made in (1)) that I am F (incidentally, a sound formal system is one in which only valid arguments can be proven).  But then (3) “I know that G(F’) is true, where this is the Gödel sentence of the system F’” (ibid).  However, (4) Gödel’s first incompleteness theorem shows that F’ could not see that the Gödel sentence is true.  Further, we can infer that (5) I am F’ (since F’ is merely F plus the assumption made in (1) that I am F), and we can also infer that I can see the truth of the Gödel sentence (and therefore given that we are F’, F’ can see the truth of the Gödel sentence). That is, (6) we have reached a contradiction (F’ can both see the truth of the Gödel sentence and cannot see the truth of the Gödel sentence).  Therefore, (7) our initial assumption must be false, that is, F, or any formal system whatsoever, cannot capture my reasoning powers."

Human beings can make contact to the Platonic world of numbers and mathematical truths which is not feasible for machines and it is for this reason that they can never ever surpass the intelligence of human mathematicians. A simple bitter truth which Plato and the other pagan mystery religions discovered long before modern science was born. The Empirical world is just a mere shadow copy of the real Platonic realm which exists independent of us.

Now we know that just if you do big number crunching doesn't mean you are thinking and somehow you've made a machine to think. Thinking is much more than just number crunching. The proponents of Strong AI are no where near to it. Even though modern artifical intelligent machines are able to act on their own without being programmed for it explicitly deep down in its chip there still lies a set of implicit machine learning algorithms which does the trick for them. What it means is that any such alogrithm can be transformed into a formal system and the Godel's Incompletness theorems can be applied to it showing that there will always be one statement where human beings know that the statement is true but the machine can never ever utter it. Hats off to Sir Roger Penrose he surely deserves a nobel prize for this discovery.
 

Sunday, 3 May 2015

Gospel of Truth is truly a joy for all philalethists

"Gospel of Truth is a joy to those who have received from the Father of Truth the gift of knowing him."

At a time when I was starting to feel that there is no one on this planet who can understand my beliefs and went into a deep depression Christ, the saviour gave me a hope by introducing me to a 2nd century Gnostic Christian named Valentinus.

If there is ever a book which I want to keep in my hand till my last breathe then it would be this book because it defines me completely, my way of thinking and my way of living. When I was absolutely demoralized the one thing which gave me strength was Valentinus' Gospel of Truth. 

Gospel of Truth upheld my beliefs and made me a much stronger person than I was ever was by showing that I am not alone in all of this that once there lived people who shared the same beliefs which I had held on to.

It gave me that self evidential proof which I needed to confirm myself that my revelation was real and my scepticism about our place in the cosmos was right. When I could back up my beliefs with evidence from the Pauline Epistles originally written in Greek I couldn't have asked for anything more than this.

Yes, the Pleroma, the body of Christ exists and this world was modelled according to the Pleroma above and our world is not the only world that exists out there independent of us. This concept of Pleroma was the very keystone of the Valentinian theology or the Paul's Pleroma theology.

Right from my teenage I had a sufficient leaning towards the Pauline Epistles, after all he was the appointed Apostle to the Gentile nations and although the word Gentile in those days always meant Greeks the mission of Saint Paul was to spread the message of the Gospel to the whole world both to Gentiles and to non-Gentiles alike. I knew that Paul was saying something completely different from what the rest of the apostles were saying and many people were saying that he corrupted the teachings of Jesus, others called him a false Apostle and some even went as far as saying that Paul was a priest of Mithras. Yes, lots of theories were floating around and everyone thought that they had cracked the problem of Paul convincingly but I always believed that truth is far from what meets the eye.

It was only after studying Valentinianism I could truly appreciate the calibre and the divinity of the great doctor of the church, Saint Paul of Tarsus. I knew he was saying something very interesting but I still had to find that one clue which could finally allow me to speak good of him and Valentinianism was that one missing part of the puzzle.

The rest of the Bible though was always uninteresting to me as it is for all Gentiles which was opinionated by even Julian, the Emperor himself who said that Christianity was always presented to him in an uninteresting manner.

Some might be wondering how could a man like myself who practices hard polytheism can truly appreciate and admire the founder (Saint Paul of Tarsus) of a monotheistic religion (Christianity) who believes in the concept of Trinity, the Father, the son and the Holy Spirit. 

The answer to that is Jesus Christ never ever established any church on earth, he always taught that the church is the pleroma of God (Ephesians), he never ever envisioned a physical church here on earth and never ever appointed any Pope to preside over it. Contrary to the strong popular belief that Pauline Christianity won out against all other forms of Christianity it was neither the Pauline nor the Jesus of Nazareth's Christianity that won out instead what won out was the Christianity of the Byzantine empire, what won was Roman imperialism, what won was the Christianity of Constantine who wanted to use it as a political tool to control the masses and the current Roman Catholic Church is the product of this course of events.

Valentinian Christians are the true Pauline Christians who received a succession of apostolic tradition starting from Saint Paul himself. This is exactly what the gnostic Ptolemy writes in his letter to Flora that we too have received a genuine apostolic tradition. Catholics do not understand the Pauline Epistles they are in two minds when it comes to Pauline Epistles whether to completely do away with the Law as Paul instructs them or to fully abide by it as Jesus advises them in his sermon on the mount. When pressed hard to give an answer they often go mum without knowing what to say.

In my honest opinion, Valentinus, Saint Paul and Yajnavalkya are all speaking about the same Holy Father, Savitr. Enjoy reading Gospel of Truth if you are interested.